Upload your Contract of Sale and Section 32. Our review agent, built by our property law team for Victorian residential property, reads the whole bundle and tells you what's in it and what's missing.
Call us if you'd like to talk it through. If you'd rather not, the review is still yours.
Most serious problems aren't inside one document — they're contradictions between two. The contract says vacant possession; the tenancy schedule shows a sitting tenant. The vendor on the front page isn't the registered proprietor on title. Finding those means reading everything and deliberately comparing across it.
Every document in your bundle is identified and mapped to page numbers, then checked against what a Vendor Statement is required to contain.
A fixed set of comparisons runs on every bundle, whether or not anything looks unusual.
You get a short summary by email, with the full report attached. Every finding points to the page and clause it came from, so you can check it yourself.
General AI is genuinely good at reading a contract now, and it will pick up most of the unfavourable special conditions. What it can't do is notice an absence, or compare two documents it was never told to compare. We do the clause review as well — and then keep going.
Detailed, well organised, and largely right about what it was given. It never mentions the owners corporation certificate, because nothing prompted it to look for a document that was never uploaded. To the reader, that silence looks like a clean bill of health.
The same special conditions — explained in plain English
Illustrative example.
If a window breaks or the hot water fails before settlement, you'd have no remedy.
Combined with SC 33, this removes your only practical leverage.
Plus what a general tool can't see
The plan of subdivision at p. 50 shows common property, so an owners corporation applies. Without the certificate you can't see the fees, the maintenance fund, or any special levy already struck.
Title at p. 49 carries a single-dwelling covenant. You told us you intend to extend. Neither document is wrong on its own — the problem only exists in the comparison.
Same clause review, plus a completeness check against what a Vendor Statement must contain, and a fixed set of comparisons between documents.
| General AI tool | isignsafe | |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews special conditions clause by clause | Yes | Yes |
| Cites the page and clause for every finding | Sometimes | Every finding |
| Tells you which documents are missing | No | Yes |
| Flags certificates that are out of date | No | Yes |
| Compares title, plan and Section 32 against each other | No | Every bundle |
| Ranks findings against your own plans for the property | No | Yes |
| Built and maintained for Victorian residential contracts | No | Yes |
| Backed by a law firm you can actually engage | No | Harry Song Lawyers |
A heritage overlay barely matters if you're moving in as-is, but it can be close to a dealbreaker if you're planning a second storey. That's why we ask those four questions before we start.
Illustrative: each buyer's top five are shown. Both receive the same contract and the same full list of findings. What changes is the order and the badges. Your answers affect how the report is ranked, never what it contains.
You can, and plenty of good ones offer a free contract review. It's built around an office diary, though — you reach them when they're open, you wait for someone to get to it, and you hear what they think on a call. That's a poor fit for a market where contracts land on a Friday evening and auctions run on Saturday morning.
| The traditional route | Starting with isignsafe |
|---|---|
| Reachable during business hours | Upload it at 11pm the night before auction |
| A day or two for a callback | A written report in about ten minutes |
| Findings explained verbally on a call | Every finding cited to a page and clause, in writing |
| Often a paralegal reviews the contract and Section 32 | The whole bundle is read, attachments included |
| Depth depends on who's available that week | The same checks run on every bundle, every time |
| One review as a courtesy; a second feels like an imposition | Review as many properties as you're considering |
| Missing documents tend to surface later in the matter | Missing documents are flagged before you sign |
| The free review opens a sales conversation | The report is yours; the conversation is optional |
Free tools usually aren't. Here's exactly what we get out of this, so you can judge it for yourself.
Harry Song Lawyers has practised in Melbourne property law since 2004, including complex matters like easements, covenants and adverse possession. Our property team built this agent for our own clients before we opened it up to everyone.
The review is free because we hope you'll ask us to act for you on the purchase — that's the paid work, at a fixed fee quoted upfront. Most people who use the review won't engage us, and that's fine.
What we don't do: sell your data, use your contract to train AI models, pass your details to brokers or agents, or email you anything other than your report unless you ask.
We quote a fixed fee upfront before any work begins, and we'll tell you honestly if your matter is straightforward enough that you don't need a firm like ours.
If you do engage us, the review you've already had becomes the starting point. We're not beginning from a blank page, and the issues flagged in your report are the ones we take to the vendor's representative.
Yes. There's no card to enter, no trial limit and nothing to pay later. We offer it because we're a law firm hoping to earn your conveyancing work, and we'd rather you met us before you signed than after.
Only so we can send you the report. We don't ask for your name or phone number, we won't add you to a mailing list, and we won't pass your address to anyone else.
No. The review is an automated report that tells you what's in your contract and what's missing from it. It isn't a substitute for a lawyer or licensed conveyancer acting for you. Where something needs a lawyer's judgment, the report says so rather than guessing.
Everything the agent sent you — the Contract of Sale, the Section 32 Vendor Statement, and all attachments including title, plans and certificates. If something is missing, don't worry: identifying what's absent is part of the review.
Your documents are never used to train AI models. To produce your report they are processed by an AI service (Anthropic), and our own team can see them for quality checks. You can ask us to delete your contract and report at any time by replying to your report email.
Established residential dwellings in Victoria. We don't currently review off-the-plan contracts, vacant land, rural or commercial property. If you upload one of those, we'll tell you rather than produce a review we can't stand behind.
For most private sales in Victoria a cooling-off period applies, with some exceptions including properties bought at auction. Your report shows whether cooling-off applies under your contract, and we'd encourage you to confirm the details with a lawyer before relying on it.
Yes, as many as you like. Most buyers look at several properties before they commit, and there's no limit on how many contracts you can send us.
Find out what's in it, and what's missing from it, before you do. Four short questions and an email address — that's all we need.
Start your free contract reviewPDF · full bundle · report in about 10 minutes